Data is the heartbeat of our operations, guiding us in every decision to keep people safe, maintain smooth processes, and protect the environment. The truth is that even little mistakes in data monitoring could cause major, expensive errors. Though small, a lost sensor or a missed alarm might cause catastrophe in vital sectors. Consider this: are we ignoring little things that could have significant effects, or are we sure our data is always accurate? Our aim in this piece is straightforward: we want to explore the typical errors people make using data monitoring tools and, more crucially, how to prevent them. These actions will help keep our company compliant and resilient by strengthening its environmental compliance, operational efficiency, and safety.
Here are the common mistakes when using data monitoring tools:
1. Sloppy Data Collection Practices
Here’s where the trouble begins. Whether it’s the wrong sensor placement, skipping routine calibration, or misunderstanding what each device is measuring, data collection can go sideways fast. When it does, we don’t just lose accuracy; we lose trust in the system that keeps us informed and safe.
Consider a setup with hundreds of sensors across a plant. If even one of these sensors isn’t placed correctly, it’s like trying to build a puzzle with a missing piece. Each sensor is part of the bigger picture, and when one’s off, the whole thing stops making sense.
How to Avoid It: Build Accuracy from the Ground Up
To close these blind spots, we must act beyond “checking in” on our equipment. Here are some steps that keep our data sharp and trustworthy:
- Calibrate Regularly: Sensors drift over time, just like any equipment. Schedule regular calibration checks to ensure each sensor reads accurately.
- Review Sensor Placement: Correctly placing sensors isn’t a “one-and-done” deal. Review placements regularly to ensure each one is where it can capture the best possible data.
- Cross-Check Data Points: Don’t rely on a single data source in critical areas. Using redundant sensors or verifying with alternative methods can help catch errors early.
- Document Everything: Keep detailed records of sensor placements, calibrations, and inspections. A log of past checks can help spot trends and prevent future blind spots.
Blind spots in data aren’t just a small inconvenience—they can lead to massive setbacks. Take the gas and flame detection field, for instance. If a sensor in a high-risk area fails to pick up a gas leak due to poor placement or calibration, that missed signal could lead to a hazardous situation.
2. Configuration Overload or Underload
It’s easy to overdo or undershoot when configuring our data systems. Too many warnings can lead to “alarm fatigue,” where we become desensitised and tune out signals we’re supposed to be watching. On the flip side, too few alerts can mean we might miss serious warning signs, leaving us in the dark when something goes wrong.
This balancing act requires serious thought. Without it, we risk falling into a “boy who cried wolf” situation—where we see so many non-essential alerts that we ignore them altogether. And when the real danger appears, we might not even notice.
How to Avoid It: Smart Configuration Practices for Real-World Use
Avoiding configuration chaos means setting up our systems so that alerts are relevant, timely, and easily actionable. Here’s how we keep our system alerting us the right way:
- Prioritise Alerts by Importance: Not all alerts are created equally. Identify critical alerts (gas leaks, temperature surges) and separate them from lower-level notifications. This helps us to concentrate on what counts most.
- Limit “Info-Only” Alerts: Info-only alerts are useful, but too many can bury important warnings. Keep them to a minimum to avoid clutter in our system.
- Customise Settings for Each Area: Each part of our site has unique risks and needs. Customising alert settings based on location ensures that each alert we receive is relevant to the specific risks of that area.
- Review and Update regularly: Things change over time. As we learn more about the patterns in our system, regular reviews help us fine-tune settings, so we’re always receiving the most useful alerts.
Alarm fatigue and poorly configured systems have caused real-world disasters. In the mining industry, for instance, missing a low gas concentration warning due to poorly configured alerts can lead to an unexpected gas build-up. In a manufacturing setup, failing to catch an early warning sign on a key piece of machinery can halt production and cost millions in downtime.
The impact is huge. A single alert we ignored because it was “one too many” could lead to unsafe working conditions, non-compliance penalties, and steep repair costs. Misconfigured systems don’t just frustrate—they create serious risks.
3. Ignoring Maintenance and Updates
Data monitoring systems are complex. They consist of sensors, software, and connections that all need to work in sync. When we ignore maintenance, we allow small issues to build up—dust in sensors, out-of-date software, and wear on components. Eventually, it’s not if something will go wrong but when.
And it’s not just physical wear and tear. Software updates are critical, too. They often contain patches for security vulnerabilities or microdata collection accuracy. Ignoring these updates can leave us with less reliable data and, sometimes, systems more vulnerable to cyber threats.
How to Avoid It: Build a Routine That Works
Keeping our data monitoring systems reliable means establishing a regular, no-excuses maintenance routine. Here’s how to stay on top of it:
- Set a Maintenance Calendar: Don’t rely on memory. Establish a fixed schedule for checking, cleaning, and recalibrating sensors and other components.
- Update Software Regularly: Software patches aren’t optional but essential for accuracy and security. Schedule updates as part of regular maintenance so nothing slips through the cracks.
- Keep Detailed Records: Document each maintenance session, noting adjustments, repairs, or recalibrations. This history helps us spot patterns and anticipate issues before they arise.
- Train Your Team: Everyone involved with data monitoring should know the importance of maintenance. When the team understands the stakes, there’s less chance of skipping or delaying crucial checks.
Neglected maintenance in industrial settings has led to equipment failures that could have been easily prevented. For instance, a water treatment plant suffered a major breakdown because sensors monitoring the chemical levels weren’t calibrated regularly. The result? A contaminated water supply, legal fines, and a damaged reputation.
The message is clear: just because a system looks fine doesn’t mean it is. Ignoring it is often far more expensive than the small, regular investment in maintenance.
4. Ignoring Context and Chasing Data Alone
Relying on raw data alone is like listening to half a conversation. We miss the environmental, seasonal, or operational factors that could explain a sudden change or spike. Without this broader view, we risk knee-jerk reactions based on incomplete information. It’s a classic case of “flying blind” with all the instruments on.
This oversight can lead us to waste resources chasing phantom issues, adjusting processes unnecessarily, or ignoring actual risks because we misunderstood the data’s story.
How to Avoid It: Putting Data into Context Every Step of the Way
Building context into our data monitoring doesn’t have to be complicated. Here’s how we can add the right context, so every data point makes sense:
- Use Baselines and Thresholds Based on Real Conditions: Establish baselines that factor in seasonal or environmental norms. This helps us know when a reading genuinely concerns or reacts to expected changes.
- Layer External Data: Add environmental or operational data to support our monitoring where possible. Tracking local weather or seasonal production variations can help us interpret trends accurately.
- Train the Team to Think Contextually: Data alone doesn’t cut it. Training our team to understand the “why” behind each data point improves their ability to recognise false alarms and spot genuine issues.
- Check for Patterns, Not Just Peaks: Instead of reacting to single spikes, look for patterns over time. A gradual shift can be more telling than an isolated spike, especially when we know the surrounding conditions.
Ignoring context has tripped up even large, established companies. Take the case of a food storage facility that misinterpreted temperature data from their cold storage units. When temperatures rose during a mild heatwave, they panicked, thinking the refrigeration system was failing and moved the stock, costing thousands. Had they considered the external conditions, they’d have realised the system was compensating exactly as it should.
The lesson? Data without context doesn’t just mislead us—it can drive unnecessary actions and costly errors.
5. Over-reliance on Automation and Ignoring the Human Touch
Automated systems are great, but they’re not foolproof. Algorithms are programmed to detect specific events and anomalies but don’t know the full story. They’re not in the room, seeing the day-to-day patterns, the subtle changes, or the context behind each reading. When we rely too heavily on automation, we’re effectively letting the system think for us, and that’s when things can slip through the cracks.
The truth is that machines don’t have intuition. They can’t pick up on the nuances of our unique setups or sense when something “feels off.” That’s why automation should assist us—not replace us.
How to Avoid It: Balance Automation with a Human Eye
We must keep our eyes on the data to get the most out of our automation tools. Here’s how we keep automation working for us without letting it take over:
- Limit Alert Overload: Fine-tune the system so only meaningful alerts make it through. Adjust thresholds to reduce the number of “false alarms” so that we’re not ignoring real risks among irrelevant alerts.
- Combine Automation with Regular Human Reviews: Make it routine to review reports and trends manually, looking for anything the algorithm might miss. A few minutes of human oversight can catch the gradual changes that automation can’t.
- Cross-Check with Other Sources: Use other monitoring methods to back up automated systems, especially for critical equipment. Manual checks can confirm automated data and spot any gaps in the alerts.
- Empower Our Team to Trust Their Instincts: Train staff to understand the limitations of automated systems. Encourage them to investigate rather than wait for an alert when something doesn’t look or feel right.
Take a real-life case from the energy sector. In a major plant, automated alerts failed to catch the early signs of a machinery breakdown. The algorithms detected no “high priority” issues, so no one was alerted. By the time it was obvious, the damage was done production halted, costs skyrocketed, and downtime extended far longer than if someone had been paying closer attention.
The moral of the story? Automation can keep an eye on things but can’t see everything. Relying solely on automated alerts left the plant blind to the gradual wear that led to a full-scale shutdown.
Secure Your Operations with Minerva’s Expertise
Don’t leave your safety and data monitoring tools to chance. With Minerva-Intra’s tailored solutions, you’re not just installing sensors but building a reliable, data-driven foundation for your entire operation.
Ready to Take Control?
Get in touch with our team for a free consultation to learn how our innovative detection and monitoring tools could be tailored to your particular requirements. We are here to ensure that your systems work as they should, that your data is correct, and that your people remain safe.
Let’s Make Your Data Work for You!
Contact us today and discover how Minerva can strengthen your operations for the long haul.
